Music industry and the Web piracy
![]() |
Photo Credit: Cristiana Ferrauti |
Kane Robinson and Richard Graham have been jailed on
the twelve of November for illegally upload songs, sometimes even before their
official release.
The links to the thousands of tracks distributed
were available on a forum called Dancing Jesus. Since 2006, more than seventy millions of members used this public space for
free downloads, according to The Guardian.
The case has once again raised the issue about free
content available on the Web.
Statistics and data may confirm that the online
markets are continuously expanding, along with the numerous threats from the
greater availability of its contents.
The Office of National Statistics released an Internetaccess bulletin on 7 August this year.
In the document, it has been said that 76% of British adults, in 2014, are able to access to the Web every day. The percentage is far higher than the data collected eight years ago, when nearly half of the people were out of the amount.
In the document, it has been said that 76% of British adults, in 2014, are able to access to the Web every day. The percentage is far higher than the data collected eight years ago, when nearly half of the people were out of the amount.
During February 2013, Apple announced that over
twenty-five billions of songs were purchased via the online store iTunes, whose
catalogue is accessible from 119 countries.
According to the Recording Industry Association ofAmerica (RIAA) – trade organization which supports the main recording companies
in the USA -, music sales decreased of half their profits comparing the years
1999 and 2013.
America suffered enormously Web piracy - a crime
which allowed the illegal download of nearly 30 billion songs from 2004 to
2009.
![]() |
Photo Credit: Elias Bizannes https://www.flickr.com/photos/liako/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode |
The high prices of immaterial element on the Web are
determined not only by the industries’ profits, but also – and more importantly
– by the artists’ rewards.
Consequently, piracy, in addition to the legal
matters, is a concern also for the possible unpaid job of the performers.
“From the artist’s point of view - said Kienda Hoji,
Principal Lecturer in Music and Business at the University of Westminster - the
idea is you are paid for what you do".
"Second to this - he continued -, if you make music, and you sell it, people use it. And this only can constitutes the reason why somebody should pay you: for the right to receive what is, after all, the result of your hard work.
"[…] However, it would be silly not to realize that money is not easy to get. […] So is a double edge: you don’t pay for music, then you don’t reward the artist, and then he is not in the position to make music. It is a problem”.
"Second to this - he continued -, if you make music, and you sell it, people use it. And this only can constitutes the reason why somebody should pay you: for the right to receive what is, after all, the result of your hard work.
"[…] However, it would be silly not to realize that money is not easy to get. […] So is a double edge: you don’t pay for music, then you don’t reward the artist, and then he is not in the position to make music. It is a problem”.
The Web has made it easier to access to more media
contents.
Many sellers adapted their markets to reach the
customers and to meet the new needs of the audience.
Nevertheless, for what regards the music industry, the
dematerialization of the products seems to have risen an endless debate for the
payment of non-physical items.
Comments
Post a Comment